I can participate. Ditto on the call in number and access code.
Valarie Bishop
Director Developmental Disabilities Council
Office of Executive Policy and Programs
The South Carolina
Department
of Administration
1205 Pendleton Street, Suite 372, Columbia, SC 29201
(803) 734-0215 | (803) 734-0241 (fax)
The South Carolina Department of Administration (admin) serves the citizens of South Carolina and agency partners by leading innovative efforts to provide secure, cost-effective, responsive and standardized services.
From: xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com <xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com>
On Behalf Of Williams, Brett (DHHS)
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 7:02 AM
To: Robert McWilliams <xxxxxx@nacdd.org>; xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com
Subject: [External] RE: Urgent Policy Call Friday 8/30, 1pm
Good morning everyone:
I will be joining the call. Erin, is the call in number the same one used for the Policy calls?
Sincerely,
Brett Williams
Public Policy Analyst
Michigan Developmental Disabilities Council
Phone: 517-284-7289
Fax- 517-335-2751
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure, or distribution of any confidential and/or privileged information contained in this email is expressly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy any and all copies of the
original message
From:
xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com <xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com>
On Behalf Of Robert McWilliams
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 6:12 PM
To: xxxxxx@nacdd.simplelists.com
Subject: Urgent Policy Call Friday 8/30, 1pm
FYI below (on behalf of Erin Prangley)
--
Dear Policy Committee,
NACDD has been asked to sign on to an amicus brief challenging the Department of Homeland Security's final "public
charge" rule. If the courts do not intervene, immigrants with disabilities and their families will be subject to the new rule in October 2019. That's why we have
to work fast. The lawyers have set a deadline for our sign-on for this Friday.
Please join our Policy Committee call on Friday, August 30, 1pm-1:30pm.
Issue: Whether NACDD should sign on to an amicus brief arguing that people with disabilities will be disproportionately harmed by the public charge
rule and therefore the rule should be invalid as a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
Rule: The public charge rule prohibits people from entering the United States (getting a visa) or becoming a permanent resident (getting a green card)
if the DHS determines they are unlikely to be "self-sufficient" and may rely on public benefits. Many changes in the new rule will have a hugely negative impact on people with disabilities, in effect combining to keep people with disabilities out of this
country. These include adding Medicaid – including Home and Community Based Services – to the benefits considered, weighing heavily against a person having a health condition that is “likely to require extensive treatment, institutionalization or interfere
with the ability to care for self, attend school or work,” having the absence of a medical condition weigh as a “positive factor,” and weighing as a heavy negative the inability for private insurance to fully cover a medical condition. NACDD commented on
the proposed rule individually and through CCD.
Analysis: In the last week, numerous lawsuits have been filed challenging the public charge rule as illegal. The goal is to stop, or at least delay,
the rule before its effective date on October 15th. Alison Barkoff (CPR) and Jennifer Mathis (Bazelon) have been in touch with litigation teams and the team coordinating amicus briefs. So far two lawsuits -- the one filed by the California
Attorney General (together with ME, OR, PA and DC) and by the New
York Attorney General (together with VT and CT) -- directly include Section 504 claims (through the Administrative Procedure Act), and one more (the filed by the Washington
Attorney General, together with 11 other states) references Section 504. Those legal teams are interested in an amicus brief from the disability community supporting
their litigation. The brief will heavily rely on the comments submitted by our community, including those by CCD, ACLU and CPR.
Groups who have already replied they are interested in joining (and need to send org statements):
American Association of People with Disabilities
American Civil Liberties Union
Association of University Centers on Disabilities
Autistic Self Advocacy Network
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
Center for Public Representation
Disability Rights Advocates
National Council on Independent Living
The Arc of the United States
Conclusion: I recommend that NACDD sign on the the amicus brief because it is consistent with our public policy principles ("protect
against forms of discrimination based on disability, ethnicity, race ... national origin ... or any other protected status") and strategic plan (NACDD is an advocate "that upholds and advances the rights of people with DD."). The brief is being written by
respected coalition partners and is based on solid legal principles. Our membership is very interested in this issue. Several of our coalition partners, including AUCD have already signed on.
Please let me know as soon as possible if you are not available for the call.
Thank you,
Erin